Drop boxes are only good for Democrats and cheating

Your signature is on your id for verification, oh yeah you liberals don’t check signatures and turned the verification factor so low on the dominion machines (along with the rino’s) that every ballot was received.

It’s unreasonable because there’s no law, anywhere, that requires a person to prove who they are. Incidentally, voter ID is not racist per se, but it’s a form of voter suppression, because not everyone is able to get an ID, nor is anyone required to have an ID.

Some legal experts believe that Voter ID is unconstitutional, because it violates both the Fourth and Fifth Amendments. The Fourth Amendment guarantees protection against “unreasonable search and seizure” of one’s personal effects, which would include an ID. If a person is registered to vote, there’s no legitimate reason for them to, later, show an ID in order to cast a ballot.

The Fifth Amendment argument is a bit more complicated, having to do with the rights of the accused. Given the presumption that Voter ID is intended to prevent voter fraud – which, of course, is against the law – then to ask for an ID is to imply that a person intends to break the law. From a legal perspective, this is tantamount to an accusation; After all, one can’t be accused of a crime if no crime has been committed. What’s more, falsely accusing someone of a crime is, itself, a crime.

In practice, Voter ID is a form of voter suppression for at least two reasons. First, it enables election judges to arbitrarily (or even capriciously) decide who can and who cannot vote, based solely on the ID being presented. This problem has serious, wide-ranging implications, because there is no nationwide standard for what is, and what isn’t, a valid ID. For example, in some states, an ID issued by a state college or university is acceptable, but in other states, it’s not. Thus, it tends to discriminate against, and suppress the vote of, younger people of college-age.

Second, and much more importantly, Voter ID fosters and encourages challenges to prospective voters, including those waiting in line at the polls, by those who hope to prevent them from casting a ballot. It’s a well-established fact that members of certain demographic groups tend to vote a certain way. As a result, those people and these groups could be – and most certainly have been – targeted, harassed, intimidated, threatened, and or retaliated against, simply for exercising their right to vote. These ugly tactics are the most extreme and dastardly form of voter suppression, despite laws against electioneering, which are notoriously difficult to enforce. Given the current national climate, it’s easy to see how such tactics – or those even worse – could quickly and easily become a widespread, organized effort.

Voter ID has been called “a solution in search of a problem.” But that’s not quite so. Instead, it’s “the right solution for the wrong problem.” It prevents voter impersonation, which is a problem, though exceedingly rare. But it cannot prevent voter fraud – which is the REAL problem. Voter ID doesn’t fix the problem; it just creates a different problem.

Regardless of party, or lack thereof, all Americans know that we must ensure the legitimacy of voters, and the integrity of the vote. But Voter ID improperly addresses the first, and totally ignores the second.

It happened in Virginia because they flooded the polls with angry parents over CRT. Trump endorsed Youngkin and told the people that the way to beat a stolen election is to flood the polls. That won’t happen too much longer because now they know they have to close that hole in order to win. This is the way it is now until DJT steps in.