Pelosi and the Dems are responsible!

You’re avoiding the point. There’s no evidence to confirm what Trump is claiming to have done. His saying so does not prove it really happened.

bark bark bark wrong again more lies from bark bark, pippi long stockings, and liddle lies’a jane!

From Reuters one of their own Fake News outlets even.

Well you’ve gotta love the BS inserted into their article starting with the title in the web page link

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/congresswoman-says-trump-administration-botched-capitol-riot-preparations-2021-05-12/

Now the Title

“Trump wanted troops to protect his supporters at Jan. 6 rally”
Now we’ll post the truthful parts of the article, funny they’ve made no corrections to this as the last update was 9 months ago.

“President Donald Trump wanted National Guard troops in Washington to protect his supporters at a Jan. 6 rally” conjecture inserted to fit the narrative here and never made by former ACTING of PRESIDENT “Trump’s former Pentagon chief testified on Wednesday.”

“Former Acting Defense Secretary Christopher Miller told a House of Representatives panel that he spoke with Trump on Jan. 3, three days before the now-former president’s fiery speech that preceded the violence” then more conjecture added and never made for the FORMER ACTING, as we now know there was far more at play that apparently this Ahole and many others within the FBI and their informants like Ray Epps instigated, as well as the Antifa activists bused in and filmed smashing windows in, and the BLM activists scattered throughout the crowd and one particular one who happened to be standing right next to Ashley Babbitt when she ws murdered and then filmed laughing with a woman who works with FAKE NEWS CNN saying “WE DID IT”, and the foolish people who fell for and went along with the calls for violence being pumped out on the internet prior to the protest with no ties to President Trump or the promoters of the Protest that were already assembled at the capitol grounds that were actually let in past the barriers removed and the selfies being taken with the Capitol Police.

” According to Miller’s testimony, Trump asked during that meeting whether the District of Columbia’s mayor had requested National Guard troops for Jan. 6″ Conveniently left out here of course was Planned PEACEFUL PROTEST to coincide with the DETAILED INFORMATION THAT HAD BEEN METHODICALLY PREPARED TO PRESENT AS EVIDENCE IN TWO HOUR INCREMENTS FOR EACH STATES ELECTORS BEING CALLED INTO QUESTION. WHICH NEVER WAS ALLOWED. Not to mention in the actual testimony provided to the House Oversight Committee ” On December 31, 2020, Washington, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser sent a written request to Major General William J. Walker, Commanding General of the D.C. National Guard, seeking unarmed National Guard support to the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department and D.C. Fire and Emergency Medical Services for planned demonstrations scheduled for 5 and 6 January.”
Funny how a Peaceful Protest planned by President Trump Event Organizers, and Supporters 99.9% of which were PEACEFUL that day are referred to by D.C. Mayor Bowwowser BARK BARK at DEMONSTRATIONS, yet the BURNING DOWN OF BUSINESSES AND PERSONAL PROPERTY THE ATTACKING INJURING AND MURDER OF INNOCENT BYSTANDERS IN THE RIOTS BY BLM AND ANTIFA, NOT TO MENTION THE ATTACK ON THE WHITE HOUSE THAT DOESN’T COUNT WHEN PRESIDENT TRUMP AND FAMILY IS INSIDE! HOW FRIGGING CONVENIENT. Now remember also that Mayor Bowser requested “UNARMED TROOPS”, because ACTING FORMER MILLER also testified “My concerns regarding the appropriate and limited use of the military in domestic matters were heightened by commentary in the media about the possibility of a military coup or that advisors to the President were advocating the declaration of martial law. I was also cognizant of the fears promulgated by many about the prior use of the military in the June 2020 response to protests near the White House and fears that the President would invoke the Insurrection Act to politicize the military in an anti-democratic manner.” Interesting all of this with UNARMED TROOPS BEING ASKED TO BE DEPLOYED?? Then this part is quite telling as well. “And, just before the Electoral College certification, ten former Secretaries of Defense signed an Op-Ed piece published in the Washington Post warning of the dangers of politicizing and using inappropriately the military.” Interesting choice of publications if I don’t say so myself, right up BARK BARKS alley though I’m sure.

“Trump told Miller to “fill” the request, the former defense secretary testified. Miller said Trump told him: “Do whatever is necessary to protect demonstrators that were executing their constitutionally protected rights.” WOW a whole paragraph without any propaganda narrative inserted. What’s omitted here is that what FORMER ACTING Miller testified and VERY IMPORTANT as well as President Trump made a bad decision here, but first in the testimony to clarify more BARK BARK LIES “Because the District of Columbia is not a state, its mayor needs Presidential approval to use the D.C. National Guard, unlike state governors who can unilaterally mobilize their National Guard forces.” but most importantly “The President had delegated his authority in this regard to the Secretary of Defense.”

So BARK BARK it REQUIRES PRESIDENTIAL APPROVAL TO USE THE NATIONAL GUARD IN D.C.! NOT PRESIDENT TRUMP’S DECISION???? Back to the article then.

“Miller made the remarks during a contentious hearing held by the House Oversight Committee, which is investigating security failures in the days leading to and during the riot.
Representative Carolyn Maloney, the Democrat who chairs the committee, demanded answers from Miller on why National Guard troops did not arrive until hours after the building was overrun.”

“Miller testified that the U.S. military was deliberately restrained that day that day when Trump’s rally turned into an assault by hundreds of his followers” Repetitive narrative inserted again, and not clarifying how or why they were restrained, hmmm I wonder why the omission? FORMER ACTING Miller lies outright here by stating “Trump’s rally turned into and assault” as the rally hadn’t actually ended and is proved by the timelines, but he actually states the truth as the rally was in the 100’s of Thousands and he clearly states here that only “hundreds of his followers” and even this is lies and conjecture as it is known not everyone present where the violence occurred were actually his followers, some of which are being held as political prisoners didn’t participate in the supposed INSURRECTION that not one person has actually been charged with, and most charges on non-felonies yet they’re being held without due process. IS THAT IN THE CONSTITUTION BARK BARK?

Reading the testimony further seems to implicate the Military’s involvement in setting up the events of January 6th. My opinion of course, but take the time and read the whole statement very carefully yourselves found here

https://oversight.house.gov/sites/democrats.oversight.house.gov/files/Miller%20Testimony.pdf

but Miller goes on to say “My obligation to the Nation was to prevent a constitutional crisis. That, in addition to the limited request from the Mayor for D.C. National Guard deployment distanced from the Capitol, is why I agreed only to deploy our Soldiers in areas away from the Capitol, avoiding amplifying the irresponsible narrative that your Armed Forces were somehow going to be co-opted in an effort to overturn the election. But I did not believe, and I think my senior advisors shared this view, that January 6, 2021 was going to be “business-as-usual”.” Here describing the MSM irresponsible narrative of unarmed troops being co-opted. Some narrative by the way, unarmed troops being co-opted to overturn the election, MSM’s role in setting up this event by spewing false narratives and propaganda in advance of the event.

So get this then next
“I was also concerned that those seeking to obstruct the Electoral College certification or otherwise disrupt our government could provoke a Soldier to act in a way that could be portrayed in the media as an attack against demonstrators exercising their First Amendment rights of assembly and speech. I was gratified to hear that most counter protestors were apparently planning to stay off the streets on January 6 to avoid providing a public platform for the rightwing demonstrators to gain further attention through fighting them.”
Hmmm he/they were concerned there would be those “SEEKING TO OBSTRUCT THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE CERTIFICATION OR OTHERWISE DISRUPT OUR GOVERNMENT” So let’s see they were aware of this GOING to happen it sounds like to me, “HOW” and if so, why did he/they want to keep the troops so far away from the actions they were expecting? Maybe to allow it to happen and unfold the way it was being PLANNED? AS IF the MSM would even consider this type of narrative concerning a conservative ooops “RIGHTWING” peaceful protest ooops again “DEMONSTRATION” concerning conservatives ” could provoke a Soldier to act in a way that could be portrayed in the media as an attack against demonstrators exercising their First Amendment rights of assembly and speech.”
See how the leftwing BLM and ANTIFA are portrayed by FORMER ACTING Miller “I was gratified to hear that most counter protestors were apparently planning to stay off the streets on January 6 to avoid providing a public platform for the rightwing demonstrators to gain further attention through fighting them.”
They’re described as “counter protestors” but wait a minute wouldn’t that make those “RIGHTWING DEMONSTRATORS” only protesters too? Doesn’t take alot of imagination to see what side of POLITICS these Military commanders are on by constantly directing the narrative of a rally in which 99.9% of those attending were PEACEFUL and not involved with the actions that took place and were obviously well aware by those in command. Much more in the testimony as to the placement of the troops locations, but this is getting too long already.

Ok finally but here again outright lies by Reuters.
“Miller testified that he was concerned in the days before Jan. 6 that sending National Guard troops to Washington would fan fears of a military coup or that Trump advisers were advocating martial law.”
Remember now these were to be unarmed troops omitted here and the fact as FORMER ACTING Miller stated at the beginning were requested by President Trump to “”Do whatever is necessary to protect demonstrators that were executing their constitutionally protected rights.” I wonder if President Trump even used the word “DEMONSTRATORS”? Why would he? Who exactly is he implying were these advisers that were suggesting “MARTIAL LAW”? Mike Lindell?

At any rate bark bark bark your narrative falls apart. How many more lies will you continue to spew in your phony propaganda you come around here peddling? President Trump obviously did request them in accordance with Mayor Bowser’s request, and actually had to authorize the final approval regarding the National Guard’s deployment.

The conjecture bark bark was fro Reuters DOH!